Showing posts with label Patrick Mahomes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patrick Mahomes. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Andy Reid’s 150th Chiefs Win Is Another Reminder of How Completely He Changed This Franchise

 The Kansas City Chiefs’ 31–10 victory over Denver gave fans plenty to celebrate.

Kenneth Walker III exploded in his debut. Patrick Mahomes returned. The defense dominated.

Quietly tucked inside all of that was another Andy Reid milestone.

The victory was Reid’s 150th as head coach of the Kansas City Chiefs.

One hundred and fifty.

Reid was already the winningest coach in franchise history, so the number does not change his place in the record book. What it does is provide another opportunity to appreciate how radically the Chiefs changed after he arrived.

It can be difficult to remember the franchise Reid inherited because the current version of Kansas City has been successful for so long.

Before Reid arrived in 2013, the Chiefs had just finished 2–14.

Kansas City was not viewed as the center of the NFL universe. Arrowhead was still Arrowhead and Chiefs Kingdom was still passionate, but sustained championship expectations belonged somewhere else.

Reid changed the standard before Patrick Mahomes ever became the starter.

Kansas City went 11–5 in Reid’s first season. The Chiefs became a consistent playoff team. The organization stabilized. Winning seasons stopped feeling exceptional and started becoming expected.

Then Mahomes arrived, and Reid’s already successful tenure became historic.

The pairing produced championships, record-setting offenses and a period in which Kansas City became the opponent every AFC contender measured itself against.

That is why 150 wins should not be reduced to a coaching statistic.

Those wins represent a cultural transformation.

Reid created an environment in which players develop, assistant coaches grow, veterans want to play and the organization rarely seems surprised by adversity.

Even last season’s 6–11 collapse did not erase that foundation.

Monday night may have been the best evidence.

Kansas City entered a new season with Mahomes returning from a major knee injury, substantial roster turnover and questions across several position groups.

The Chiefs responded by beating the defending AFC West champions by three touchdowns.

That looked very much like an Andy Reid team.

My Take

There are going to be bigger celebrations for Andy Reid someday.

A Hall of Fame ceremony feels inevitable.

His name will live permanently in Chiefs history.

But I think milestones like 150 wins are worth noticing while he is still standing on the sideline.

Chiefs fans know what the franchise looked like before 2013.

Reid did not simply inherit Patrick Mahomes and ride along for the championships. He built a winning organization first. Mahomes then elevated that organization into something extraordinary.

That distinction matters.

The greatest coaches do more than win games. They change what a franchise believes is normal.

Before Reid, Chiefs fans hoped for a great season.

Under Reid, they expect one.

One hundred and fifty Kansas City victories later, that may be his greatest accomplishment.

Sources:

Kahlil Benson Just Turned the Chiefs’ Biggest Week 1 Concern Into One of Their Best Stories

 The Kansas City Chiefs entered Week 1 with one question hanging over Patrick Mahomes’ return more than any other:

Could they protect him?

Josh Simmons was unavailable, and Kansas City handed the left-tackle job to Kahlil Benson, an undrafted rookie who had not played the position in college. His assignment in his first NFL game was hardly forgiving. Denver’s Nik Bonitto entered the season with 27.5 sacks over the previous two years.

That looked like the kind of matchup capable of ruining an otherwise carefully planned comeback for Mahomes.

Instead, Benson became one of the best stories of the night.

According to the Chiefs and Next Gen Stats, Benson allowed just one pressure on 32 pass-blocking snaps. His 3.2 percent pressure rate was the best among all rookie offensive tackles in Week 1.

Think about the path required to get there.

Benson was not drafted. He was not even one of Kansas City’s original undrafted free-agent signings. He came to rookie minicamp as a tryout player after starting at right tackle for national champion Indiana in 2025. Out of dozens of players trying to earn another day in the NFL, he played well enough to get a contract.

Then he survived training camp.

Then he made the 53-man roster.

Then injuries moved him to a position he had not played since high school.

Then Andy Reid put him on national television against one of football’s better edge rushers.

And Benson responded by allowing one pressure.

That does not mean Kansas City has permanently solved left tackle. Josh Simmons remains an important part of the Chiefs’ plans, and one good game should never be mistaken for a complete evaluation of a young offensive lineman.

But depth changes seasons.

The Chiefs spent much of the offseason trying to make sure Mahomes would not again be asked to compensate for instability in front of him. Benson’s performance suggests Kansas City may have found something far more valuable than emergency depth.

He may be a legitimate NFL tackle.

The running game helped him. So did Andy Reid’s play design and the presence of an experienced interior line. That should not diminish what Benson accomplished. Every offensive tackle receives schematic help at times. Eventually, the player still has to block the defender across from him.

Benson did.

My Take

I spent plenty of time worrying about the Chiefs’ offensive line before Week 1, so I am not going to pretend I expected this.

I didn’t.

An undrafted rookie making his NFL debut at left tackle against Denver’s pass rush sounded like exactly the wrong situation for a quarterback playing his first game after major knee surgery.

Instead, Benson looked like he belonged.

The important thing now is not to turn one good night into unrealistic expectations. Young tackles get exposed. Defensive coordinators study film. Future opponents will identify the techniques Benson handles well and the ones he does not.

The test gets harder from here.

But Kansas City now knows something it did not know a week ago: when Benson’s name was called in a difficult situation, he did not merely survive.

He performed.

For an undrafted rookie who arrived at Chiefs rookie camp on a tryout, that is one remarkable beginning.

Sources:

Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Travis Kelce Just Passed Jason Witten — and the Only Tight End Left Is Tony Gonzalez

 There was so much happening at Arrowhead on Monday night that a piece of NFL history almost felt like a side story.

Patrick Mahomes was playing his first real football in nine months.

Kenneth Walker III was running through Denver.

The Chiefs defense was suffocating the Broncos.

And Travis Kelce quietly moved past Jason Witten into second place on the NFL's all-time list for receiving yards by a tight end.

Only Tony Gonzalez remains ahead of him.

Think about what that means from a Kansas City perspective.

Two of the three most productive receiving tight ends in NFL history built their legacies in a Chiefs uniform.

That is remarkable.

Kelce's milestone came on a 59-yard reception during Kansas City's 31–10 win. It pushed his career receiving total to 13,073 yards, moving him beyond Witten and leaving Gonzalez as the final name above him.

Kelce reportedly treated the accomplishment the way he treats most individual milestones: as something secondary to winning.

That reaction is part of why his career has become what it has.

The statistics are enormous, but Kelce's place in Chiefs history cannot really be explained by a spreadsheet.

He became Mahomes' most trusted answer when a play broke down.

Third down.

Red zone.

Playoffs.

Super Bowl.

When Kansas City needed somebody to understand what Mahomes was seeing in real time, Kelce was usually the player moving into the same open space.

Their connection helped redefine what a tight end could look like in a modern passing offense.

Kelce was not simply lining up next to a tackle and running traditional tight-end routes. Andy Reid moved him everywhere. He aligned in the slot, outside, in motion and in formations designed specifically to force defenders to reveal coverage.

Then Mahomes arrived, and the relationship between quarterback and tight end became almost improvisational.

That combination produced championships.

Now it is producing history.

The Gonzalez comparison makes the milestone especially interesting for Chiefs fans because the two careers represent very different eras of the franchise.

Gonzalez spent years producing at an elite level for Kansas City without enjoying the postseason success that eventually surrounded Kelce. He was greatness during years when the Chiefs were often searching for stability.

Kelce became greatness during the most successful period the franchise has ever experienced.

Different eras.

Different offenses.

Different circumstances.

Same uniform.

My Take

I do not think Chiefs fans should rush through these Kelce milestones.

There will be plenty of time someday to debate where he ranks among the greatest tight ends ever. There will be arguments about Gonzalez, Rob Gronkowski, postseason production, longevity, blocking and every other measurement football fans can invent.

Right now, I would rather appreciate what Kansas City has witnessed.

The Chiefs went from Tony Gonzalez to Travis Kelce within a relatively short stretch of franchise history.

Most teams spend decades hoping to find one tight end capable of becoming a franchise icon.

Kansas City got two players who now sit at the very top of the NFL record book.

And Kelce is still adding to his total.

I do not know whether he will eventually catch Gonzalez in career yardage. That is not really the point.

Passing Witten means the list has narrowed to two names.

Tony Gonzalez.

Travis Kelce.

For Chiefs Kingdom, that is one heck of a list.

Sources:

Kenneth Walker III Just Changed What the Chiefs Offense Can Be

For years, opposing defenses have entered games against the Kansas City Chiefs with one overriding objective:

Make somebody other than Patrick Mahomes beat them.

Kenneth Walker III may have just changed the meaning of that sentence.

Walker made his Chiefs debut Monday night and ran for a career-high 173 yards in Kansas City's 31–10 victory over the Denver Broncos. His biggest moment came early in the third quarter, when he broke loose for a 60-yard touchdown that turned a 14–7 game into a two-score Kansas City lead.

By the end of the night, the story was no longer simply that Mahomes had successfully returned from major knee surgery.

It was that the Chiefs suddenly looked capable of winning without asking him to perform a weekly magic act.

That matters enormously.

Kansas City's offense became increasingly difficult to watch at times last season because too many possessions seemed to reach the same point: Mahomes had to solve the problem. Protection broke down, the running game failed to create favorable downs, or the offense stalled until the quarterback was forced to create something outside the structure of the play.

Monday night looked different.

Walker gave the Chiefs an answer that did not require Mahomes to hold the football, escape pressure or manufacture an impossible throw.

Hand it off.

Let Walker find the crease.

Make the defense tackle him.

And then do it again.

The Broncos entered the season with a defense expected to be among the NFL's best. That makes Walker's performance more meaningful than a big statistical night against an overmatched opponent. Kansas City did not merely use the running game to protect a lead late. The Chiefs used it to create the lead.

The 60-yard touchdown was the obvious highlight, but the larger value came from the pressure Walker placed on Denver's entire defensive structure.

A defense that has to respect the run cannot devote every resource to confusing Mahomes. Linebackers have to step forward. Safeties have to respect run fits. Edge defenders cannot attack the quarterback without discipline. Play-action becomes more convincing because the handoff is no longer an empty threat.

That is where this could become much bigger than one spectacular debut.

Mahomes does not need Kansas City to become a run-first offense.

He needs defenses to believe that Kansas City could beat them by running the football.

There is a major difference.

Andy Reid can still spread the field, use motion, attack mismatches and let Mahomes improvise. But if Walker continues forcing defenses to devote real attention to the backfield, every other part of Reid's offense becomes harder to defend.

And for a quarterback returning from reconstructive knee surgery, that is about the best possible development.

My Take

This is exactly what I wanted to see from the Chiefs offense.

Not because I expected 173 rushing yards every week. Nobody should.

What matters is that Denver had to respect something besides Mahomes.

For much of the Mahomes era, Kansas City could get away with being unbalanced because the quarterback was so extraordinary that conventional rules did not always apply. But after last season—and after the injury—I do not want the Chiefs building an offense around the assumption that Mahomes can rescue every bad situation.

Walker gives them another way to win.

If a defense wants to play light boxes and flood the passing lanes, run the ball.

If a pass rush wants to attack aggressively upfield, punish it with the run.

If Kansas City gets a fourth-quarter lead, make the opponent tackle Walker until the clock disappears.

The Chiefs acquired him to change the backfield.

After one game, I am wondering whether he may change the entire offense.

That is a much bigger deal.

Sources:

Saturday, September 12, 2026

There are hot takes, and then there are Skip Bayless hot takes.

 There are hot takes, and then there are Skip Bayless hot takes.

This one definitely qualifies.

Bayless recently suggested that Patrick Mahomes tearing his ACL might actually turn out to be a good thing for the Kansas City Chiefs quarterback in the long run. The reasoning is that the injury could force Mahomes to change parts of his game—particularly his tendency to extend plays, scramble and create offense outside the structure of the play.

At first glance, calling a torn ACL a “good thing” sounds ridiculous.

And I’m certainly not going to go that far.

But underneath the headline-grabbing wording, I actually think there is an interesting point worth discussing.

Mahomes Has Always Been at His Best When Chaos Begins

One of the things that has made Patrick Mahomes special throughout his career is his ability to turn a broken play into something spectacular.

The pocket collapses.

Mahomes escapes.

The defense loses track of Travis Kelce.

Mahomes throws from some ridiculous angle that quarterbacks are taught never to use.

First down.

We’ve watched it happen so many times that Chiefs fans almost expect it.

But there is also a downside.

Sometimes Mahomes’ confidence in his ability to make something happen can lead him to hold onto the football longer than necessary. Instead of taking the easy completion, he may try to extend the play looking for something bigger.

And sometimes instead of simply delivering the ball on schedule, he starts improvising.

Most quarterbacks would never get away with it.

Mahomes does because he’s Patrick Mahomes.

But that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s always the best option.

Bayless Might Actually Have a Point

The argument Bayless makes is essentially that recovering from the knee injury could encourage Mahomes to become more selective about when he leaves the pocket.

That could mean staying in the pocket an extra moment.

Trusting the offensive line.

Taking the five-yard completion.

Getting the football out on time.

Living to play another down instead of trying to turn every broken play into a highlight.

And if Mahomes adds more of that discipline to everything he already does?

That could be scary for the rest of the NFL.

We sometimes forget that quarterback development doesn’t stop when a player becomes a superstar.

Tom Brady evolved.

Peyton Manning evolved.

John Elway evolved.

The great quarterbacks eventually learn that beating defenses mentally can be just as devastating as beating them physically.

Mahomes is now entering another stage of his career where that evolution may become important.

The Injury Wasn’t a Good Thing

This is where I disagree with the way Bayless framed the argument.

The injury itself wasn't good.

There is nothing positive about watching your franchise quarterback suffer a torn ACL.

Mahomes underwent surgery in December and spent months working through rehabilitation. The fact that he attacked the recovery process aggressively and worked his way back to full practice participation is impressive.

But we shouldn't have to pretend the injury was somehow beneficial to recognize that something positive could come from the experience.

There is a difference.

Mahomes has now experienced something he really hadn't dealt with before: a major injury threatening his ability to play football.

That can change the way an athlete approaches the game.

Maybe he slides sooner.

Maybe he throws the ball away instead of fighting for another three yards.

Maybe he takes the checkdown instead of scrambling around for eight seconds.

Maybe Andy Reid and the Chiefs design the offense to get the football out of his hands quicker.

None of those things would make Mahomes less dangerous.

They might actually make him harder to defend.

Remember What Happened Before the Injury

There is another part of this discussion Chiefs fans shouldn't ignore.

Kansas City's offense had already been changing before Mahomes suffered the injury.

The explosive plays that once seemed automatic weren't coming nearly as frequently.

Defenses adjusted.

They started taking away the deep ball and forcing Kansas City to methodically move down the field.

Mahomes had already been learning how to win differently.

The spectacular 50-yard bomb might have been replaced by an eight-yard completion underneath.

And honestly?

That's what elite quarterbacks eventually have to do.

Defensive coordinators spend entire offseasons studying Mahomes. They aren't going to repeatedly give him the same opportunities he had earlier in his career.

Mahomes has to evolve.

The Chiefs offense has to evolve with him.

Protecting Mahomes Has to Matter More Than Ever

There is another lesson Kansas City should take from all of this.

Patrick Mahomes is the franchise.

Everything revolves around No. 15.

That means protecting him can't simply mean improving the offensive line.

It also means protecting Mahomes from Mahomes.

I mean that in the best possible way.

His competitiveness is one of the reasons he's great.

Mahomes believes he can make every play.

He believes he can escape every defender.

He believes he can get the extra yard.

That attitude has produced some unforgettable moments.

But there are times when the smartest play might be the most boring one.

Throw it away.

Slide.

Take the checkdown.

Punt.

Come back on the next drive.

Chiefs fans might not enjoy watching Mahomes become slightly more conservative, but I'll happily trade a few spectacular scrambles for having him healthy in January.

A Different Mahomes Could Be an Even More Dangerous Mahomes

This is the part of Bayless' argument I find fascinating.

What happens if Mahomes becomes a better pocket quarterback because of this experience?

Not because he suddenly loses his ability to improvise.

But because he becomes more selective about using it.

Imagine a version of Mahomes who operates efficiently within Andy Reid's offense for most of the game and only unleashes the backyard-football version when Kansas City truly needs it.

That's a nightmare for defenses.

You can't sell out against the scramble because he may stay in the pocket.

You can't sit on underneath routes because Mahomes can still attack you deep.

You can't play man coverage without worrying about him running.

You can't play zone without giving him opportunities to find holes.

The physical talent is still there.

The creativity is still there.

The difference could simply be knowing when not to use it.

My Take

I don't believe tearing an ACL is ever a “good thing.”

But I understand what Bayless is trying to say.

Adversity changes athletes.

Sometimes it exposes weaknesses.

Sometimes it forces adjustments.

And sometimes those adjustments extend careers.

Patrick Mahomes has already accomplished more than most quarterbacks could ever dream of accomplishing. But his next challenge isn't proving he can make impossible plays.

We've already seen that.

The next challenge may be proving he doesn't always need to.

If this injury causes Mahomes to become more disciplined in the pocket, quicker with his decisions and more selective with his scrambling while still maintaining the creativity that made him great, then something valuable could eventually come from an awful situation.

And that's the part the rest of the NFL probably doesn't want to think about.

Because Patrick Mahomes with all of his old tricks plus another level of patience and pocket discipline?

That might be an even tougher version of No. 15 to beat.

What do you think, Chiefs Kingdom?

Could Mahomes actually come back from the ACL injury as a better quarterback, or would you rather see him continue playing the aggressive, improvisational style that made him a superstar?

Friday, September 11, 2026

Kansas City Chiefs’ Left Tackle Problem Is Real — But D.J. Humphries Isn’t the Answer

 The Kansas City Chiefs suddenly have a very uncomfortable question to answer heading into Week 1:

Who is going to protect Patrick Mahomes’ blind side?

With Josh Simmons battling a back injury and missing Thursday’s practice, the Chiefs could find themselves turning to Kahlil Benson at left tackle when Kansas City opens the 2026 season against the Denver Broncos on Monday Night Football.

That uncertainty makes almost any veteran offensive tackle who becomes available worth discussing.

And that brings us to a familiar name: D.J. Humphries.

Matt Conner of Arrowhead Addict recently raised the issue after the Washington Commanders released Humphries, arguing that while Kansas City clearly needs some insurance at tackle, going back to Humphries would be the wrong move.

I agree.

I Understand Why Chiefs Fans Would Consider Humphries

On the surface, it makes sense.

Humphries is a former first-round pick. He has nearly 100 NFL starts under his belt. He made a Pro Bowl. Most importantly, he already knows the Kansas City Chiefs organization.

When you're staring at the possibility of an inexperienced tackle protecting Mahomes in the first game of the season, signing an experienced veteran sounds comforting.

But sometimes familiarity gives us a false sense of security.

The Chiefs already tried this.

Kansas City brought Humphries in during the 2024 season when the team was desperately searching for stability at left tackle. Instead of becoming the solution, Humphries lasted one start before suffering a hamstring injury that sidelined him. Since then, his career hasn't exactly experienced a resurgence. He appeared in eight games for the Los Angeles Rams last season but started only one. Washington signed him in late August and released him just a couple of weeks later.

That doesn't scream "solution."

It screams another temporary patch.

At Some Point, You Have to Find Out What You Have

This is where I think the Chiefs may be making the right decision, even if it makes Chiefs Kingdom nervous.

Kansas City's current offensive line group includes Josh Simmons, Kahlil Benson, Jaylon Moore, Diego Pounds, Kingsley Suamataia and one of the best interior combinations in football with Creed Humphrey and Trey Smith.

If Simmons can't go Monday night, Benson may get an enormous opportunity.

Is that risky?

Absolutely.

An undrafted young tackle potentially making a Week 1 start while protecting Patrick Mahomes against a division opponent on Monday Night Football isn't exactly the scenario any Chiefs fan would draw up.

But there comes a point where Kansas City has to determine whether Benson can actually play.

Training camp practices and preseason games can only tell you so much.

Eventually, the lights come on.

The Bigger Concern Is Patrick Mahomes

This situation also feels different because of what's happening behind the offensive line.

Mahomes is returning after suffering torn knee ligaments last December. He's participating fully in practice and appears ready to go for Week 1, but protecting him should be priority No. 1, No. 2 and probably No. 3 for this franchise.

That's exactly why I don't believe the Chiefs should sign a tackle simply because fans recognize his name.

If Brett Veach is going to add someone, that player needs to represent a legitimate upgrade.

That's the standard.

The question shouldn't be:

"Is D.J. Humphries experienced?"

Of course he is.

The question should be:

"Is D.J. Humphries better right now than Kahlil Benson, Jaylon Moore or the other options already on Kansas City's roster?"

Based on what we've seen over the last couple of seasons, I'm not convinced the answer is yes.

Don't Confuse Experience With Improvement

This is something NFL teams face all the time.

A recognizable veteran becomes available and immediately fans start connecting dots.

We've seen him play before.

We know his name.

He's played in big games.

He has experience.

Therefore, he must make the roster better.

Except that isn't necessarily true.

Humphries' résumé is impressive when looking at his entire career. But Kansas City wouldn't be signing the 2021 Pro Bowl version of D.J. Humphries.

They'd be signing the 2026 version.

That's an important distinction.

The Chiefs need to evaluate the player Humphries is today—not the player he was several years ago.

My Take

I'm definitely concerned about left tackle.

How could you not be?

Patrick Mahomes is coming back from a major knee injury, Josh Simmons has a back problem, and the Chiefs may have to trust an inexperienced Kahlil Benson against Denver in Week 1.

That's far from ideal.

But I also don't believe making a move simply for the sake of making a move helps anything.

If Brett Veach finds a veteran tackle who clearly improves this offensive line, absolutely go get him.

If a trade opportunity develops for a legitimate starting-caliber tackle, explore it.

But bringing back D.J. Humphries because he's available and familiar with Kansas City feels more like reacting to the problem than actually solving it.

And there's another possibility Chiefs fans should consider.

Maybe the Chiefs know something about Kahlil Benson that we don't yet.

Kansas City kept Benson on the 53-man roster for a reason. The coaching staff has watched every practice, every rep and every meeting. If Andy Reid, Andy Heck and the Chiefs' offensive staff believe Benson deserves an opportunity, I'm willing to see what the kid can do.

That doesn't mean Kansas City should stop looking for offensive tackle help.

They absolutely shouldn't.

It means the Chiefs should look for the right tackle—not simply the most familiar one available.

D.J. Humphries had his opportunity in Kansas City.

Right now, I'd rather see the Chiefs find out whether one of their young tackles can become part of the future than go back to a veteran who already showed us why he probably isn't.

What do you think, Chiefs Kingdom? Would you bring D.J. Humphries back as insurance, or would you trust Kahlil Benson and the tackles already on the roster?

This post is commentary inspired by reporting from Matt Conner of Arrowhead Addict. Kansas City Chiefs – My Take is an independent fan blog and is not affiliated with the Kansas City Chiefs or the NFL.

Thursday, September 10, 2026

Kenneth Walker Could Change More Than the Chiefs’ Running Game

 For years, when you thought about the Kansas City Chiefs offense, the running back position probably wasn't the first thing that came to mind.

Patrick Mahomes. Travis Kelce. Explosive passes. Andy Reid drawing something on a napkin that somehow turns into a touchdown on Sunday.

That was Chiefs football.

But heading into the 2026 season, Kansas City appears to be trying something different.

And Kenneth Walker III may be right in the middle of it.

A recent Kansas City Star story by Pete Sweeney makes the case that the Chiefs didn't bring Walker to Kansas City simply because they wanted a better running back. They believe he has the ability to change how opposing defenses play the entire offense.

I think that distinction is incredibly important.

Defenses Changed the Way They Played Mahomes

Go back to the early Patrick Mahomes years and opposing defenses were routinely being embarrassed.

Tyreek Hill could fly past a secondary.

Kelce could find the empty space underneath.

Mahomes could hold onto the football, scramble around and suddenly launch it 50 yards downfield.

Eventually, NFL defenses adjusted.

Teams increasingly began showing Kansas City two-high safety looks designed to prevent those devastating deep passes. Rather than allowing Mahomes to beat them with one huge play, defenses basically started telling Kansas City:

Fine. Run the football. Throw underneath. Drive 12 plays down the field.

The problem is that Kansas City hasn't consistently punished teams for making that choice.

Andy Reid acknowledged that these softer defensive shells have placed additional pressure on the passing game and increased the importance of running, play-action and methodically attacking underneath.

That brings us to Walker.

Kenneth Walker Changes the Equation

Walker isn't simply a running back capable of taking whatever the offensive line gives him.

He can create something himself.

He has the speed to get outside.

He has the strength to run downhill.

He can change direction without completely losing momentum.

And, maybe most importantly, he can make a defender miss and turn an ordinary running play into an explosive one.

Chiefs offensive line coach Andy Heck has specifically pointed to Walker's ability to operate within multiple running concepts, while the coaching staff also believes his receiving and route-running ability can make him a much more complete offensive weapon.

That's where this gets interesting.

Because if Walker becomes a player defenses genuinely have to worry about, those safeties can't simply spend the entire afternoon sitting deep waiting for Mahomes.

Eventually somebody has to come forward.

And when that happens?

Patrick Mahomes starts getting opportunities over the top again.

The Play-Action Game Could Be the Biggest Winner

This might actually be the part of the Walker signing I'm most excited about.

Play-action only becomes truly dangerous when the defense respects the running game.

If linebackers don't believe you're actually going to hand the ball off, they're not taking that extra step toward the line of scrimmage.

If safeties aren't worried about the running back getting into the second level, they're not creeping forward.

Walker potentially changes that.

Reports throughout the offseason have indicated Kansas City wants to incorporate more under-center offense and use Walker both as a runner and receiver, helping make those play-action fakes much more believable.

Imagine Mahomes turning his back to the defense, selling the handoff to Walker and then coming back around with linebackers already moving toward the line.

Now Kelce has more room.

Now Rashee Rice has more room.

Now Xavier Worthy potentially has a safety who took one step in the wrong direction.

One step is all Worthy needs.

Walker Could Also Help Protect Mahomes

There's another factor that makes the timing of this move especially significant.

Mahomes is returning from the ACL and LCL injuries he suffered last December, and Andy Reid said this week that Mahomes is expected to start Kansas City's opener against Denver barring a setback.

Kansas City shouldn't want Mahomes carrying the offense by himself every week anyway.

But this year?

That's even more important.

A legitimate running game means fewer situations where Mahomes has to drop back 40 or 45 times.

It means fewer obvious third-and-long passing downs.

It potentially means fewer opportunities for defensive linemen to pin their ears back and go after his surgically repaired knee.

And it gives Kansas City something it hasn't really had in quite a while: an offensive star in the backfield who can become the focal point of the offense when necessary.

Walker enters Kansas City after winning Super Bowl MVP with Seattle and signing a three-year deal reportedly worth roughly $43 million. Kansas City hasn't produced a 1,000-yard rusher since Kareem Hunt did it as a rookie in 2017.

That tells you just how different this could be.

But Here's the Part I'll Be Watching

Signing Kenneth Walker doesn't automatically fix the Chiefs offense.

Kansas City actually has to commit to using him.

That's the part I'll be watching closely.

There have been plenty of games during the Andy Reid era where the running game appears to be working perfectly well and then seemingly disappears from the playbook.

Sometimes that's understandable.

When Patrick Mahomes is your quarterback, throwing the football isn't exactly a bad strategy.

But if the Chiefs really want Walker to reshape this offense, they can't abandon him after six carries because the first quarter didn't go exactly according to plan.

They need to make defenses tackle him.

Again.

And again.

And again.

Those four-yard runs in the first quarter might become eight-yard runs in the fourth.

More importantly, every successful run makes the next play-action fake just a little more dangerous.

My Take

I believe Kenneth Walker III could end up being the most important offensive acquisition Kansas City has made in years.

Not because I expect the Chiefs suddenly to become a run-first football team.

They shouldn't.

Patrick Mahomes is still Patrick Mahomes.

The goal isn't to take the football away from Mahomes.

The goal is to make life easier for him.

That's the difference.

If defenses can sit back with two safeties and dare Kansas City to run the football without suffering any consequences, they're going to keep doing it.

Walker gives the Chiefs an opportunity to finally make them pay.

And if defensive coordinators eventually have to choose between putting another defender near the line of scrimmage to stop Kenneth Walker or leaving two safeties deep to stop Patrick Mahomes?

That's exactly the kind of impossible decision Andy Reid wants them making.

After a disappointing 2025 season, Kansas City doesn't necessarily need to recreate the old “Legion of Zoom” offense.

Maybe the better answer is building something defenses haven't seen from this version of the Chiefs before.

A dangerous Mahomes passing attack.

A legitimate explosive running game.

Play-action.

Screens.

Under-center formations.

And a running back capable of scoring from anywhere.

We should start getting our first real look Monday night when the Chiefs host the Denver Broncos at Arrowhead Stadium to open the 2026 season.

If Walker forces Denver's defense to start creeping toward the line of scrimmage, pay attention to what happens next.

Because that's when the real fun could begin.

What do you think, Chiefs Kingdom?

Can Kenneth Walker III transform the Chiefs offense, or will Kansas City eventually fall back into relying primarily on Patrick Mahomes and the passing game?

Drop your take in the comments.



Andy Reid’s Left Tackle Gamble Is a Huge Risk With Patrick Mahomes Returning

 The Kansas City Chiefs haven't even played their first game of the 2026 season yet, and we may already have our first decision for Chiefs Kingdom to argue about.

With starting left tackle Josh Simmons dealing with a back issue and looking increasingly unlikely to play Monday night against the Denver Broncos, Andy Reid appears prepared to hand the job of protecting Patrick Mahomes' blind side to undrafted rookie Kahlil Benson. Reid has said the Chiefs are comfortable with Benson on the left side and that Kansas City intends to put its "five best guys" on the field.

On the surface, that's a great story.

Benson went from a rookie-camp tryout to making the Chiefs' 53-man roster in a matter of months. He started at right tackle for national champion Indiana last season and impressed Kansas City enough during training camp that he was seriously competing for a starting job. The Chiefs officially signed him only after he earned a contract during their rookie minicamp in May.

But there's a pretty big difference between being a great story and being the guy responsible for protecting Patrick Mahomes against Denver's pass rush.

And that's where I have some concerns.

The Arrowhead Addict article that sparked this discussion makes a compelling argument that Reid should reconsider the plan and move veteran Jaylon Moore to left tackle instead. Moore isn't an All-Pro, but he has something Benson doesn't have: actual NFL experience protecting the blind side.

More importantly, we've already seen him do it for Kansas City.

When Josh Simmons missed time last season, Moore made four starts at left tackle. The Chiefs went 3-1 in those games and averaged 27.5 points. Before arriving in Kansas City, Moore also started games at left tackle for San Francisco while filling in for Trent Williams.

Does that mean Moore is suddenly one of the NFL's premier tackles? Of course not.

But there is a massive difference between "not elite" and "never done this before."

Benson spent his college career primarily on the right side and inside. The Chiefs have been working him at left tackle since Simmons' injury, but putting him there for an NFL regular-season opener—against Denver, no less—is an entirely different test.

Normally, maybe I'd be more willing to roll the dice.

This isn't a normal situation.

Patrick Mahomes is coming back from ACL and LCL injuries.

Reid says Mahomes is likely to start Monday night after a remarkable nine-month recovery, meaning the Chiefs are putting their franchise quarterback back on the field for the first time since the knee injury that ended his 2025 season.

That alone should change the calculation.

I don't want Mahomes spending his first game back wondering whether pressure is coming from his blind side. I don't want him unnecessarily scrambling because a young tackle misses an assignment. And I definitely don't want to see Kansas City put its most important player in additional danger simply because the coaching staff wants to see whether an undrafted rookie can handle the assignment.

There is a time for development.

Week 1 against Denver with Mahomes returning from major knee surgery isn't when I'd choose to experiment.

Now, there is another side to this.

Andy Reid, offensive line coach Andy Heck and the rest of Kansas City's staff have watched Benson every day. We've seen only a small fraction of his snaps. They've seen hundreds.

Reid's confidence isn't based on a highlight clip or a preseason scouting report. If he's willing to put Benson at left tackle, there's obviously something the coaching staff believes he can handle.

There's also something to be said for continuity. Rather than moving Moore from the right side and rearranging the offensive line again, Kansas City has spent time preparing Benson specifically to fill Simmons' spot. Reid clearly believes Benson belongs among the Chiefs' best five linemen right now.

And Reid has earned a little benefit of the doubt over the years.

Okay—a lot.

But even Hall of Fame coaches can make decisions worth questioning.

For me, this comes down to risk versus reward.

What's the upside of starting Benson at left tackle?

If he performs well, Kansas City may have discovered another long-term offensive-line piece. That's fantastic.

But what's the downside?

An inexperienced rookie could struggle against a dangerous Denver front while protecting a quarterback playing his first meaningful football since suffering a major knee injury.

Those two outcomes don't carry equal weight.

I'd rather be conservative.

Put Jaylon Moore at left tackle. Put Benson on the right side, where he has considerably more experience. Give Mahomes the veteran protecting his blind side. Help the tackles with Noah Gray or Travis Kelce when necessary. Use the running backs to chip edge rushers. Get the ball out quickly early in the game.

Do whatever it takes to let Mahomes settle back into football without spending Monday night running for his life.

Maybe Benson goes out there and makes all of us questioning the move look ridiculous.

I would be perfectly happy with that.

In fact, I hope that's exactly what happens.

But considering what happened to Mahomes last season—and considering how important this season is for a Chiefs team trying to get back to the postseason—I don't think this is the moment to prove how much faith you have in an undrafted rookie.

Sometimes the boring decision is the right decision.

And in Week 1, protecting Patrick Mahomes should matter a whole lot more than making a great underdog story even better.

What do you think, Chiefs Kingdom? Would you trust Kahlil Benson at left tackle against Denver, or move Jaylon Moore back to the blind side?


Sources: The original discussion comes from Owen Smith's Sept. 10 Arrowhead Addict article arguing that Kansas City should reconsider its left-tackle plan. Reid's comments about Benson, Simmons and the "five best guys" have also been reported by NBC Sports and other Chiefs reporters.

Rashee Rice Doesn't Need to Return to Rookie Form — The Chiefs Need Him to Be Better

 

Kansas City is asking a lot from Rashee Rice in 2026. Considering what's riding on this season, I don't think that's unreasonable.

One of the more interesting questions surrounding the Kansas City Chiefs heading into the 2026 season is also one of the simplest:

What exactly are we going to get from Rashee Rice?

An article making the rounds this week asks whether the Chiefs can get Rice back to the production he showed during his rookie season — and perhaps even more.

I think that's exactly the right question.

But I'll take it one step further.

Getting the 2023 version of Rashee Rice back would certainly help the Chiefs.

I'm not sure it's enough.

Remember Just How Good Rice Was as a Rookie

It's easy to forget how promising Rice looked when everything started.

As a rookie in 2023, Rice caught 79 passes for 938 yards and seven touchdowns. Those 79 receptions and seven receiving touchdowns were Chiefs rookie records, and his 938 receiving yards were second-most by a rookie in franchise history.

Then he got even better during Kansas City's championship run.

Rice finished that postseason with 26 receptions for 262 yards, helping the Chiefs win Super Bowl LVIII.

This wasn't some receiver occasionally benefiting because Patrick Mahomes happened to throw the ball his direction.

Rice looked like he might actually become Mahomes' next legitimate No. 1 wide receiver.

And early in 2024, it looked like that transformation was already happening.

Before his season was derailed after four games, Rice had already caught 24 passes for 288 yards and two touchdowns.

Over a full season, that pace would have produced some very impressive numbers.

Then everything changed.

Two Lost Years

The problem with evaluating Rashee Rice today is that we haven't really seen a normal Rashee Rice season since his rookie year.

He played only four games in 2024.

He played eight games in 2025, catching 53 passes for 571 yards and five touchdowns.

That's actually pretty good production when you consider the circumstances.

But injuries, suspension and off-field problems have turned what looked like the emergence of Kansas City's next star receiver into two years of wondering what might have been.

And that's why 2026 feels different.

There really aren't any more developmental seasons available.

Rice is 26 years old and entering the final year of his rookie contract.

It's time.

The Chiefs Have Basically Bet Their Passing Game on Him

This might be the biggest part of the story.

Kansas City didn't go out this offseason and acquire some established 1,200-yard receiver to rescue the offense.

Instead, the Chiefs are essentially betting that the receivers already in the building are better than what we saw last season.

That means Rashee Rice.

That means Xavier Worthy.

That means Tyquan Thornton.

And it means younger players like Cyrus Allen and Jalen Royals developing.

The Chiefs' current receiver room includes Rice, Worthy, Thornton, Allen, Royals and Nikko Remigio.

That's not exactly a group overflowing with proven NFL No. 1 receivers.

Rice is the closest thing they have.

And statistically, there's a legitimate reason for Kansas City to believe in him. Pro Football Focus noted that Rice has averaged 2.29 yards per route run for his career, and despite playing only eight games last season, he earned the highest receiving grade among Chiefs wide receivers.

When he's on the football field, Rice can play.

Availability has been the much bigger problem.

Here's Where I Think Rice Can Take the Next Step

There is something I'd like to see change about Rice's game this year.

He's already dangerous with the football in his hands.

Get him the ball quickly. Let him catch it underneath. Let him break tackles. Let him turn a six-yard completion into 18.

That's his bread and butter.

But I want more.

If Rashee Rice is really going to become Patrick Mahomes' No. 1 receiver, I'd like to see him become more than just one of the NFL's best yards-after-catch receivers.

I want to see him consistently beat man coverage.

I want to see him win farther down the field.

I want defenses lining up on third-and-8 knowing Mahomes wants Rice — and still being unable to stop it.

ESPN reported this offseason that Rice struggled at times last season with drops and creating separation against man coverage.

That's the next challenge.

Because if he adds that dimension to what he already does after the catch, we're no longer talking about Rice simply matching his rookie season.

We're talking about a legitimate 1,000-plus-yard No. 1 receiver.

Mahomes Needs That Guy

This is what makes the Rashee Rice story bigger than Rashee Rice.

The Chiefs need somebody to become that guy again.

We've spent years talking about Kansas City winning without an elite wide receiver because Patrick Mahomes can seemingly make almost anything work.

And for a while, he did.

But there comes a point where asking your quarterback to overcome every weakness on the roster stops being a strategy.

The Chiefs' offense wasn't good enough last season.

No Chiefs wide receiver reached 600 receiving yards in 2025.

Now Mahomes is coming back from the serious knee injury that ended his 2025 season, with Andy Reid saying this week that Mahomes is likely to start the opener against Denver barring a setback.

Maybe this isn't the season to ask Mahomes to perform magic every Sunday.

Give him weapons.

And Rashee Rice has the talent to be the biggest one.

My Take

I think Rashee Rice is going to have a big season.

Maybe I'm being overly optimistic, but we've already seen enough flashes to know the talent isn't imaginary.

79 catches. 938 yards. Seven touchdowns.

That was the rookie.

Then came 24 catches in four games in 2024.

Then 53 catches in only eight games last year.

There's a pretty obvious pattern hiding underneath all the chaos:

When Rashee Rice actually plays football, he produces.

The question has never really been whether he belongs in the NFL.

The question has been whether he can stay healthy, stay available and allow his football ability to finally become the main Rashee Rice storyline.

This season, there aren't many excuses left.

He's entering a contract year.

The Chiefs badly need a No. 1 receiver.

Patrick Mahomes needs dependable weapons.

And Rice should finally have the opportunity to play a complete season and prove exactly what he is.

So do the Chiefs need rookie-year Rashee Rice?

Absolutely.

But I'm setting the bar higher.

My prediction: 90+ receptions, 1,100+ yards and 8–10 touchdowns if Rice plays at least 15 games.

If that happens, the conversation at the end of the season won't be about whether Rashee Rice returned to rookie form.

It'll be about how much the Chiefs are willing to pay to keep Patrick Mahomes' No. 1 receiver in Kansas City.

And that's a conversation I'd be perfectly happy to have.

Go Chiefs.


Source: “Chiefs want rookie-year output from Rashee Rice, and then some. Can they get it?” — Wichita Eagle/Kansas City Star via Apple News. 

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Sixth in the AFC? The Football World May Be Underrating the Chiefs Again

 The Kansas City Chiefs are entering unfamiliar territory: they are no longer the automatic answer when the football world is asked to name the AFC’s best team.

In a preseason survey published by The Athletic, six NFL executives ranked Kansas City an average of 5.7 among AFC teams—sixth in the conference. Their individual votes placed the Chiefs third, fifth, fifth, fifth, seventh and ninth. Only one executive categorized Kansas City as a Super Bowl contender, while the other five viewed the Chiefs as division contenders.

Sixth place sounds almost insulting for a franchise led by Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes. It is also not completely irrational.

The Chiefs finished 6–11 last season. They missed the playoffs and watched a different team represent the conference after Kansas City had reached three consecutive Super Bowls. Mahomes is coming back from major knee surgery. The roster underwent significant changes, including the trade of All-Pro cornerback Trent McDuffie. Young players will be asked to replace proven production on both sides of the ball.

An objective observer should not ignore those facts simply because the Chiefs dominated the previous era. Reputation can earn respect, but it cannot cover a receiver, protect the quarterback or generate a pass rush.

Still, there is a strange contradiction inside the ranking.

The same survey listed Kansas City’s projected win total at 10.5, tied for the second-highest figure in the AFC. In other words, the broader market expects the Chiefs to win roughly 11 games while the executives collectively placed five conference teams ahead of them.

That gap reveals the real debate surrounding Kansas City. The Chiefs are not being dismissed. They are being treated as a high-floor team with more uncertainty than the conference’s presumed elite.

The skeptics have questions that Kansas City must answer. Can Mahomes remain effective when plays break down? Will the rebuilt secondary survive against elite quarterbacks? Can the offensive line stabilize quickly? Will younger defenders produce enough pressure around Chris Jones? Can an offense that slipped badly last season rediscover its identity under returning coordinator Eric Bieniemy?

Those are legitimate questions. But every AFC contender carries its own version of them.

What separates Kansas City is the quality of the people responsible for finding answers. Reid has spent more than a decade adjusting his offense to different personnel. Steve Spagnuolo has repeatedly rebuilt defensive packages during the season rather than depending on a finished product in September. Brett Veach has been aggressive about adding players and reshaping the roster when the team’s weaknesses become obvious.

Most importantly, the Chiefs still have Mahomes. His knee deserves scrutiny, and nobody should assume he will immediately look identical to his pre-injury self. But ranking Kansas City requires evaluating more than one reconstructed ligament. It requires deciding how much the league’s most accomplished active quarterback, paired with one of its best coaches, should count when the roster around them remains unsettled.

At least one executive in the survey essentially made that argument, choosing the Chiefs third and expressing confidence that Reid and a healthy Mahomes could deliver 11 victories.

That may be the most reasonable position. Kansas City should not be handed the AFC crown because of what happened several years ago. It also should not be treated like an ordinary rebuilding team because of one disastrous season.

The 2026 Chiefs are a volatile mix of championship infrastructure and unproven pieces. The ceiling remains a Super Bowl. The floor is lower than fans became accustomed to during the franchise’s dominant run.

That volatility may explain why the executives disagreed so sharply. A third-place vote says the Chiefs’ foundation still matters. A ninth-place vote says the roster turnover and health questions are too significant to overlook. Both views can be defended before the season begins.

From a Chiefs fan’s perspective, there is also something refreshing about the uncertainty. Kansas City spent years carrying the pressure of being the favorite in nearly every meaningful conversation. Every loss became a referendum. Every close victory was treated as evidence that the dynasty was slipping.

Now the Chiefs have something they have rarely possessed during the Mahomes era: a chance to surprise people.

Rankings in September do not decide home-field advantage, division titles or playoff games. They measure confidence before the evidence arrives. Kansas City will have 17 opportunities to show whether sixth was a fair warning or a serious miscalculation.

The Chiefs have not earned the right to dismiss their doubters. They have earned the right to make those doubters nervous.

Sources: The Athletic: NFL executives rank the AFC; Arrowhead Pride: Chiefs ranked outside the AFC’s top five; Chiefs.com: Kansas City’s 2026 roster moves


Editorial and Copyright Notes

  • These posts are original fan analysis based on publicly reported facts. They do not reproduce or closely rewrite the source articles.

  • Recheck roster status, injuries, betting lines and game availability immediately before publishing because NFL news can change quickly.

  • Link to original reporting when publishing, especially for surveys, direct interviews and team announcements.

  • The “just over 40 games” figure is an estimate that can change because of international scheduling and playoff appearances.

  • The AFC ranking reflects a preseason opinion survey, not an official league ranking.

  • Do not reuse source photographs without permission. Use properly licensed editorial photography, team-approved media or original graphics.