Kansas City Chiefs’ Left Tackle Problem Is Real — But D.J. Humphries Isn’t the Answer

 The Kansas City Chiefs suddenly have a very uncomfortable question to answer heading into Week 1:

Who is going to protect Patrick Mahomes’ blind side?

With Josh Simmons battling a back injury and missing Thursday’s practice, the Chiefs could find themselves turning to Kahlil Benson at left tackle when Kansas City opens the 2026 season against the Denver Broncos on Monday Night Football.

That uncertainty makes almost any veteran offensive tackle who becomes available worth discussing.

And that brings us to a familiar name: D.J. Humphries.

Matt Conner of Arrowhead Addict recently raised the issue after the Washington Commanders released Humphries, arguing that while Kansas City clearly needs some insurance at tackle, going back to Humphries would be the wrong move.

I agree.

I Understand Why Chiefs Fans Would Consider Humphries

On the surface, it makes sense.

Humphries is a former first-round pick. He has nearly 100 NFL starts under his belt. He made a Pro Bowl. Most importantly, he already knows the Kansas City Chiefs organization.

When you're staring at the possibility of an inexperienced tackle protecting Mahomes in the first game of the season, signing an experienced veteran sounds comforting.

But sometimes familiarity gives us a false sense of security.

The Chiefs already tried this.

Kansas City brought Humphries in during the 2024 season when the team was desperately searching for stability at left tackle. Instead of becoming the solution, Humphries lasted one start before suffering a hamstring injury that sidelined him. Since then, his career hasn't exactly experienced a resurgence. He appeared in eight games for the Los Angeles Rams last season but started only one. Washington signed him in late August and released him just a couple of weeks later.

That doesn't scream "solution."

It screams another temporary patch.

At Some Point, You Have to Find Out What You Have

This is where I think the Chiefs may be making the right decision, even if it makes Chiefs Kingdom nervous.

Kansas City's current offensive line group includes Josh Simmons, Kahlil Benson, Jaylon Moore, Diego Pounds, Kingsley Suamataia and one of the best interior combinations in football with Creed Humphrey and Trey Smith.

If Simmons can't go Monday night, Benson may get an enormous opportunity.

Is that risky?

Absolutely.

An undrafted young tackle potentially making a Week 1 start while protecting Patrick Mahomes against a division opponent on Monday Night Football isn't exactly the scenario any Chiefs fan would draw up.

But there comes a point where Kansas City has to determine whether Benson can actually play.

Training camp practices and preseason games can only tell you so much.

Eventually, the lights come on.

The Bigger Concern Is Patrick Mahomes

This situation also feels different because of what's happening behind the offensive line.

Mahomes is returning after suffering torn knee ligaments last December. He's participating fully in practice and appears ready to go for Week 1, but protecting him should be priority No. 1, No. 2 and probably No. 3 for this franchise.

That's exactly why I don't believe the Chiefs should sign a tackle simply because fans recognize his name.

If Brett Veach is going to add someone, that player needs to represent a legitimate upgrade.

That's the standard.

The question shouldn't be:

"Is D.J. Humphries experienced?"

Of course he is.

The question should be:

"Is D.J. Humphries better right now than Kahlil Benson, Jaylon Moore or the other options already on Kansas City's roster?"

Based on what we've seen over the last couple of seasons, I'm not convinced the answer is yes.

Don't Confuse Experience With Improvement

This is something NFL teams face all the time.

A recognizable veteran becomes available and immediately fans start connecting dots.

We've seen him play before.

We know his name.

He's played in big games.

He has experience.

Therefore, he must make the roster better.

Except that isn't necessarily true.

Humphries' résumé is impressive when looking at his entire career. But Kansas City wouldn't be signing the 2021 Pro Bowl version of D.J. Humphries.

They'd be signing the 2026 version.

That's an important distinction.

The Chiefs need to evaluate the player Humphries is today—not the player he was several years ago.

My Take

I'm definitely concerned about left tackle.

How could you not be?

Patrick Mahomes is coming back from a major knee injury, Josh Simmons has a back problem, and the Chiefs may have to trust an inexperienced Kahlil Benson against Denver in Week 1.

That's far from ideal.

But I also don't believe making a move simply for the sake of making a move helps anything.

If Brett Veach finds a veteran tackle who clearly improves this offensive line, absolutely go get him.

If a trade opportunity develops for a legitimate starting-caliber tackle, explore it.

But bringing back D.J. Humphries because he's available and familiar with Kansas City feels more like reacting to the problem than actually solving it.

And there's another possibility Chiefs fans should consider.

Maybe the Chiefs know something about Kahlil Benson that we don't yet.

Kansas City kept Benson on the 53-man roster for a reason. The coaching staff has watched every practice, every rep and every meeting. If Andy Reid, Andy Heck and the Chiefs' offensive staff believe Benson deserves an opportunity, I'm willing to see what the kid can do.

That doesn't mean Kansas City should stop looking for offensive tackle help.

They absolutely shouldn't.

It means the Chiefs should look for the right tackle—not simply the most familiar one available.

D.J. Humphries had his opportunity in Kansas City.

Right now, I'd rather see the Chiefs find out whether one of their young tackles can become part of the future than go back to a veteran who already showed us why he probably isn't.

What do you think, Chiefs Kingdom? Would you bring D.J. Humphries back as insurance, or would you trust Kahlil Benson and the tackles already on the roster?

This post is commentary inspired by reporting from Matt Conner of Arrowhead Addict. Kansas City Chiefs – My Take is an independent fan blog and is not affiliated with the Kansas City Chiefs or the NFL.

Kenneth Walker Could Change More Than the Chiefs’ Running Game

 For years, when you thought about the Kansas City Chiefs offense, the running back position probably wasn't the first thing that came to mind.

Patrick Mahomes. Travis Kelce. Explosive passes. Andy Reid drawing something on a napkin that somehow turns into a touchdown on Sunday.

That was Chiefs football.

But heading into the 2026 season, Kansas City appears to be trying something different.

And Kenneth Walker III may be right in the middle of it.

A recent Kansas City Star story by Pete Sweeney makes the case that the Chiefs didn't bring Walker to Kansas City simply because they wanted a better running back. They believe he has the ability to change how opposing defenses play the entire offense.

I think that distinction is incredibly important.

Defenses Changed the Way They Played Mahomes

Go back to the early Patrick Mahomes years and opposing defenses were routinely being embarrassed.

Tyreek Hill could fly past a secondary.

Kelce could find the empty space underneath.

Mahomes could hold onto the football, scramble around and suddenly launch it 50 yards downfield.

Eventually, NFL defenses adjusted.

Teams increasingly began showing Kansas City two-high safety looks designed to prevent those devastating deep passes. Rather than allowing Mahomes to beat them with one huge play, defenses basically started telling Kansas City:

Fine. Run the football. Throw underneath. Drive 12 plays down the field.

The problem is that Kansas City hasn't consistently punished teams for making that choice.

Andy Reid acknowledged that these softer defensive shells have placed additional pressure on the passing game and increased the importance of running, play-action and methodically attacking underneath.

That brings us to Walker.

Kenneth Walker Changes the Equation

Walker isn't simply a running back capable of taking whatever the offensive line gives him.

He can create something himself.

He has the speed to get outside.

He has the strength to run downhill.

He can change direction without completely losing momentum.

And, maybe most importantly, he can make a defender miss and turn an ordinary running play into an explosive one.

Chiefs offensive line coach Andy Heck has specifically pointed to Walker's ability to operate within multiple running concepts, while the coaching staff also believes his receiving and route-running ability can make him a much more complete offensive weapon.

That's where this gets interesting.

Because if Walker becomes a player defenses genuinely have to worry about, those safeties can't simply spend the entire afternoon sitting deep waiting for Mahomes.

Eventually somebody has to come forward.

And when that happens?

Patrick Mahomes starts getting opportunities over the top again.

The Play-Action Game Could Be the Biggest Winner

This might actually be the part of the Walker signing I'm most excited about.

Play-action only becomes truly dangerous when the defense respects the running game.

If linebackers don't believe you're actually going to hand the ball off, they're not taking that extra step toward the line of scrimmage.

If safeties aren't worried about the running back getting into the second level, they're not creeping forward.

Walker potentially changes that.

Reports throughout the offseason have indicated Kansas City wants to incorporate more under-center offense and use Walker both as a runner and receiver, helping make those play-action fakes much more believable.

Imagine Mahomes turning his back to the defense, selling the handoff to Walker and then coming back around with linebackers already moving toward the line.

Now Kelce has more room.

Now Rashee Rice has more room.

Now Xavier Worthy potentially has a safety who took one step in the wrong direction.

One step is all Worthy needs.

Walker Could Also Help Protect Mahomes

There's another factor that makes the timing of this move especially significant.

Mahomes is returning from the ACL and LCL injuries he suffered last December, and Andy Reid said this week that Mahomes is expected to start Kansas City's opener against Denver barring a setback.

Kansas City shouldn't want Mahomes carrying the offense by himself every week anyway.

But this year?

That's even more important.

A legitimate running game means fewer situations where Mahomes has to drop back 40 or 45 times.

It means fewer obvious third-and-long passing downs.

It potentially means fewer opportunities for defensive linemen to pin their ears back and go after his surgically repaired knee.

And it gives Kansas City something it hasn't really had in quite a while: an offensive star in the backfield who can become the focal point of the offense when necessary.

Walker enters Kansas City after winning Super Bowl MVP with Seattle and signing a three-year deal reportedly worth roughly $43 million. Kansas City hasn't produced a 1,000-yard rusher since Kareem Hunt did it as a rookie in 2017.

That tells you just how different this could be.

But Here's the Part I'll Be Watching

Signing Kenneth Walker doesn't automatically fix the Chiefs offense.

Kansas City actually has to commit to using him.

That's the part I'll be watching closely.

There have been plenty of games during the Andy Reid era where the running game appears to be working perfectly well and then seemingly disappears from the playbook.

Sometimes that's understandable.

When Patrick Mahomes is your quarterback, throwing the football isn't exactly a bad strategy.

But if the Chiefs really want Walker to reshape this offense, they can't abandon him after six carries because the first quarter didn't go exactly according to plan.

They need to make defenses tackle him.

Again.

And again.

And again.

Those four-yard runs in the first quarter might become eight-yard runs in the fourth.

More importantly, every successful run makes the next play-action fake just a little more dangerous.

My Take

I believe Kenneth Walker III could end up being the most important offensive acquisition Kansas City has made in years.

Not because I expect the Chiefs suddenly to become a run-first football team.

They shouldn't.

Patrick Mahomes is still Patrick Mahomes.

The goal isn't to take the football away from Mahomes.

The goal is to make life easier for him.

That's the difference.

If defenses can sit back with two safeties and dare Kansas City to run the football without suffering any consequences, they're going to keep doing it.

Walker gives the Chiefs an opportunity to finally make them pay.

And if defensive coordinators eventually have to choose between putting another defender near the line of scrimmage to stop Kenneth Walker or leaving two safeties deep to stop Patrick Mahomes?

That's exactly the kind of impossible decision Andy Reid wants them making.

After a disappointing 2025 season, Kansas City doesn't necessarily need to recreate the old “Legion of Zoom” offense.

Maybe the better answer is building something defenses haven't seen from this version of the Chiefs before.

A dangerous Mahomes passing attack.

A legitimate explosive running game.

Play-action.

Screens.

Under-center formations.

And a running back capable of scoring from anywhere.

We should start getting our first real look Monday night when the Chiefs host the Denver Broncos at Arrowhead Stadium to open the 2026 season.

If Walker forces Denver's defense to start creeping toward the line of scrimmage, pay attention to what happens next.

Because that's when the real fun could begin.

What do you think, Chiefs Kingdom?

Can Kenneth Walker III transform the Chiefs offense, or will Kansas City eventually fall back into relying primarily on Patrick Mahomes and the passing game?

Drop your take in the comments.

Andy Reid’s Left Tackle Gamble Is a Huge Risk With Patrick Mahomes Returning

 The Kansas City Chiefs haven't even played their first game of the 2026 season yet, and we may already have our first decision for Chiefs Kingdom to argue about.

With starting left tackle Josh Simmons dealing with a back issue and looking increasingly unlikely to play Monday night against the Denver Broncos, Andy Reid appears prepared to hand the job of protecting Patrick Mahomes' blind side to undrafted rookie Kahlil Benson. Reid has said the Chiefs are comfortable with Benson on the left side and that Kansas City intends to put its "five best guys" on the field.

On the surface, that's a great story.

Benson went from a rookie-camp tryout to making the Chiefs' 53-man roster in a matter of months. He started at right tackle for national champion Indiana last season and impressed Kansas City enough during training camp that he was seriously competing for a starting job. The Chiefs officially signed him only after he earned a contract during their rookie minicamp in May.

But there's a pretty big difference between being a great story and being the guy responsible for protecting Patrick Mahomes against Denver's pass rush.

And that's where I have some concerns.

The Arrowhead Addict article that sparked this discussion makes a compelling argument that Reid should reconsider the plan and move veteran Jaylon Moore to left tackle instead. Moore isn't an All-Pro, but he has something Benson doesn't have: actual NFL experience protecting the blind side.

More importantly, we've already seen him do it for Kansas City.

When Josh Simmons missed time last season, Moore made four starts at left tackle. The Chiefs went 3-1 in those games and averaged 27.5 points. Before arriving in Kansas City, Moore also started games at left tackle for San Francisco while filling in for Trent Williams.

Does that mean Moore is suddenly one of the NFL's premier tackles? Of course not.

But there is a massive difference between "not elite" and "never done this before."

Benson spent his college career primarily on the right side and inside. The Chiefs have been working him at left tackle since Simmons' injury, but putting him there for an NFL regular-season opener—against Denver, no less—is an entirely different test.

Normally, maybe I'd be more willing to roll the dice.

This isn't a normal situation.

Patrick Mahomes is coming back from ACL and LCL injuries.

Reid says Mahomes is likely to start Monday night after a remarkable nine-month recovery, meaning the Chiefs are putting their franchise quarterback back on the field for the first time since the knee injury that ended his 2025 season.

That alone should change the calculation.

I don't want Mahomes spending his first game back wondering whether pressure is coming from his blind side. I don't want him unnecessarily scrambling because a young tackle misses an assignment. And I definitely don't want to see Kansas City put its most important player in additional danger simply because the coaching staff wants to see whether an undrafted rookie can handle the assignment.

There is a time for development.

Week 1 against Denver with Mahomes returning from major knee surgery isn't when I'd choose to experiment.

Now, there is another side to this.

Andy Reid, offensive line coach Andy Heck and the rest of Kansas City's staff have watched Benson every day. We've seen only a small fraction of his snaps. They've seen hundreds.

Reid's confidence isn't based on a highlight clip or a preseason scouting report. If he's willing to put Benson at left tackle, there's obviously something the coaching staff believes he can handle.

There's also something to be said for continuity. Rather than moving Moore from the right side and rearranging the offensive line again, Kansas City has spent time preparing Benson specifically to fill Simmons' spot. Reid clearly believes Benson belongs among the Chiefs' best five linemen right now.

And Reid has earned a little benefit of the doubt over the years.

Okay—a lot.

But even Hall of Fame coaches can make decisions worth questioning.

For me, this comes down to risk versus reward.

What's the upside of starting Benson at left tackle?

If he performs well, Kansas City may have discovered another long-term offensive-line piece. That's fantastic.

But what's the downside?

An inexperienced rookie could struggle against a dangerous Denver front while protecting a quarterback playing his first meaningful football since suffering a major knee injury.

Those two outcomes don't carry equal weight.

I'd rather be conservative.

Put Jaylon Moore at left tackle. Put Benson on the right side, where he has considerably more experience. Give Mahomes the veteran protecting his blind side. Help the tackles with Noah Gray or Travis Kelce when necessary. Use the running backs to chip edge rushers. Get the ball out quickly early in the game.

Do whatever it takes to let Mahomes settle back into football without spending Monday night running for his life.

Maybe Benson goes out there and makes all of us questioning the move look ridiculous.

I would be perfectly happy with that.

In fact, I hope that's exactly what happens.

But considering what happened to Mahomes last season—and considering how important this season is for a Chiefs team trying to get back to the postseason—I don't think this is the moment to prove how much faith you have in an undrafted rookie.

Sometimes the boring decision is the right decision.

And in Week 1, protecting Patrick Mahomes should matter a whole lot more than making a great underdog story even better.

What do you think, Chiefs Kingdom? Would you trust Kahlil Benson at left tackle against Denver, or move Jaylon Moore back to the blind side?

Sources: The original discussion comes from Owen Smith's Sept. 10 Arrowhead Addict article arguing that Kansas City should reconsider its left-tackle plan. Reid's comments about Benson, Simmons and the "five best guys" have also been reported by NBC Sports and other Chiefs reporters.

Rashee Rice Doesn't Need to Return to Rookie Form — The Chiefs Need Him to Be Better

 

Kansas City is asking a lot from Rashee Rice in 2026. Considering what's riding on this season, I don't think that's unreasonable.

One of the more interesting questions surrounding the Kansas City Chiefs heading into the 2026 season is also one of the simplest:

What exactly are we going to get from Rashee Rice?

An article making the rounds this week asks whether the Chiefs can get Rice back to the production he showed during his rookie season — and perhaps even more.

I think that's exactly the right question.

But I'll take it one step further.

Getting the 2023 version of Rashee Rice back would certainly help the Chiefs.

I'm not sure it's enough.

Remember Just How Good Rice Was as a Rookie

It's easy to forget how promising Rice looked when everything started.

As a rookie in 2023, Rice caught 79 passes for 938 yards and seven touchdowns. Those 79 receptions and seven receiving touchdowns were Chiefs rookie records, and his 938 receiving yards were second-most by a rookie in franchise history.

Then he got even better during Kansas City's championship run.

Rice finished that postseason with 26 receptions for 262 yards, helping the Chiefs win Super Bowl LVIII.

This wasn't some receiver occasionally benefiting because Patrick Mahomes happened to throw the ball his direction.

Rice looked like he might actually become Mahomes' next legitimate No. 1 wide receiver.

And early in 2024, it looked like that transformation was already happening.

Before his season was derailed after four games, Rice had already caught 24 passes for 288 yards and two touchdowns.

Over a full season, that pace would have produced some very impressive numbers.

Then everything changed.

Two Lost Years

The problem with evaluating Rashee Rice today is that we haven't really seen a normal Rashee Rice season since his rookie year.

He played only four games in 2024.

He played eight games in 2025, catching 53 passes for 571 yards and five touchdowns.

That's actually pretty good production when you consider the circumstances.

But injuries, suspension and off-field problems have turned what looked like the emergence of Kansas City's next star receiver into two years of wondering what might have been.

And that's why 2026 feels different.

There really aren't any more developmental seasons available.

Rice is 26 years old and entering the final year of his rookie contract.

It's time.

The Chiefs Have Basically Bet Their Passing Game on Him

This might be the biggest part of the story.

Kansas City didn't go out this offseason and acquire some established 1,200-yard receiver to rescue the offense.

Instead, the Chiefs are essentially betting that the receivers already in the building are better than what we saw last season.

That means Rashee Rice.

That means Xavier Worthy.

That means Tyquan Thornton.

And it means younger players like Cyrus Allen and Jalen Royals developing.

The Chiefs' current receiver room includes Rice, Worthy, Thornton, Allen, Royals and Nikko Remigio.

That's not exactly a group overflowing with proven NFL No. 1 receivers.

Rice is the closest thing they have.

And statistically, there's a legitimate reason for Kansas City to believe in him. Pro Football Focus noted that Rice has averaged 2.29 yards per route run for his career, and despite playing only eight games last season, he earned the highest receiving grade among Chiefs wide receivers.

When he's on the football field, Rice can play.

Availability has been the much bigger problem.

Here's Where I Think Rice Can Take the Next Step

There is something I'd like to see change about Rice's game this year.

He's already dangerous with the football in his hands.

Get him the ball quickly. Let him catch it underneath. Let him break tackles. Let him turn a six-yard completion into 18.

That's his bread and butter.

But I want more.

If Rashee Rice is really going to become Patrick Mahomes' No. 1 receiver, I'd like to see him become more than just one of the NFL's best yards-after-catch receivers.

I want to see him consistently beat man coverage.

I want to see him win farther down the field.

I want defenses lining up on third-and-8 knowing Mahomes wants Rice — and still being unable to stop it.

ESPN reported this offseason that Rice struggled at times last season with drops and creating separation against man coverage.

That's the next challenge.

Because if he adds that dimension to what he already does after the catch, we're no longer talking about Rice simply matching his rookie season.

We're talking about a legitimate 1,000-plus-yard No. 1 receiver.

Mahomes Needs That Guy

This is what makes the Rashee Rice story bigger than Rashee Rice.

The Chiefs need somebody to become that guy again.

We've spent years talking about Kansas City winning without an elite wide receiver because Patrick Mahomes can seemingly make almost anything work.

And for a while, he did.

But there comes a point where asking your quarterback to overcome every weakness on the roster stops being a strategy.

The Chiefs' offense wasn't good enough last season.

No Chiefs wide receiver reached 600 receiving yards in 2025.

Now Mahomes is coming back from the serious knee injury that ended his 2025 season, with Andy Reid saying this week that Mahomes is likely to start the opener against Denver barring a setback.

Maybe this isn't the season to ask Mahomes to perform magic every Sunday.

Give him weapons.

And Rashee Rice has the talent to be the biggest one.

My Take

I think Rashee Rice is going to have a big season.

Maybe I'm being overly optimistic, but we've already seen enough flashes to know the talent isn't imaginary.

79 catches. 938 yards. Seven touchdowns.

That was the rookie.

Then came 24 catches in four games in 2024.

Then 53 catches in only eight games last year.

There's a pretty obvious pattern hiding underneath all the chaos:

When Rashee Rice actually plays football, he produces.

The question has never really been whether he belongs in the NFL.

The question has been whether he can stay healthy, stay available and allow his football ability to finally become the main Rashee Rice storyline.

This season, there aren't many excuses left.

He's entering a contract year.

The Chiefs badly need a No. 1 receiver.

Patrick Mahomes needs dependable weapons.

And Rice should finally have the opportunity to play a complete season and prove exactly what he is.

So do the Chiefs need rookie-year Rashee Rice?

Absolutely.

But I'm setting the bar higher.

My prediction: 90+ receptions, 1,100+ yards and 8–10 touchdowns if Rice plays at least 15 games.

If that happens, the conversation at the end of the season won't be about whether Rashee Rice returned to rookie form.

It'll be about how much the Chiefs are willing to pay to keep Patrick Mahomes' No. 1 receiver in Kansas City.

And that's a conversation I'd be perfectly happy to have.

Go Chiefs.

Source: “Chiefs want rookie-year output from Rashee Rice, and then some. Can they get it?” — Wichita Eagle/Kansas City Star via Apple News.